These studies were conducted in order to establish the dose dependency
and relative peripheral versus central activity of four prototypical
cholinergic antagonists on the rodent passive avoidance response, a wi
dely used animal model of retention. Subcutaneous administration of 0.
1 to 100 mg/kg revealed a potency profile of scopolamine > atropine >>
methylscopolamine greater than or equal to methylatropine for the imp
airment of passive avoidance responding. A series of neurological asse
ssments of the doses used indicated that side effects alone were not s
ufficient to impair passive avoidance responding. Although inactive wh
en delivered peripherally, methylatropine was able to produce retentio
n deficits at 10 nmol (3.66 mu g) when administered intracerebrally. T
o further evaluate whether systemic methylatropine could enter the cen
tral nervous system, either scopolamine or atropine was administered s
ubcutaneously in mice and rats pretreated with 10-100 mg/kg methylatro
pine. The deficit-producing effects of scopolamine and atropine were a
bolished with methylatropine. Thus methylatropine is an exclusive peri
pheral antagonist; its ability to block the deficit-producing effects
of scopolamine and atropine may occur through a change in blood-brain
barrier permeability or through uncharacterized pharmacokinetic proper
ties.