Wj. Sandborn et al., POUCHITIS AFTER ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS - A POUCHITIS DISEASE-ACTIVITY INDEX, Mayo Clinic proceedings, 69(5), 1994, pp. 409-415
Objective: To develop a ''Pouchitis Disease Activity Index'' (PDAI) an
d to compare it with other diagnostic scoring systems for pouchitis. D
esign: We compared patients who had an optimal outcome with those who
had a poor result attributable to recurrent pouchitis after ileal pouc
h-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis at the Mayo Clinic. M
aterial and Methods: We evaluated the applicability of a PDAI that qua
ntitated clinical findings and the endoscopic and histologic features
of acute inflammation in four groups of patients: (1) 10 who underwent
IPAA for ulcerative colitis and had symptoms compatible with a clinic
al diagnosis of pouchitis, (2) 5 who underwent IPAA for ulcerative col
itis and did not have pouchitis, (3) 5 who underwent IPAA for familial
adenomatous polyposis and had no symptoms of pouchitis, and (4) 5 who
had a Brooke ileostomy for ulcerative colitis (control group). Result
s: The PDAI was significantly greater in patients with the clinical fe
atures of pouchitis than it was for patients in the other three groups
. All 10 patients with pouchitis fulfilled the PDAI criteria for a dia
gnosis of pouchitis; in contrast, only 1 of these 10 patients met the
diagnostic criteria for pouchitis by application of previously establi
shed scoring systems. No asymptomatic patient qualified for a diagnosi
s of pouchitis by the PDAI criteria. Conclusion: The PDAI provides sim
ple, objective, and quantitative criteria for pouch inflammation after
IPAA and is more sensitive than prior scoring systems.