NONINVASIVE QUANTIFICATION OF AORTIC AND MITRAL REGURGITATION - A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND COLOR-DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Citation
F. Lederbogen et al., NONINVASIVE QUANTIFICATION OF AORTIC AND MITRAL REGURGITATION - A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND COLOR-DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 119(17), 1994, pp. 611-617
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Volume
119
Issue
17
Year of publication
1994
Pages
611 - 617
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
The degree of valvular regurgitation was measured by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and colour-Doppler echocardiography (CDE) in 2 3 patients (14 men, 9 women; mean age 53 [19-75] years) with aortic (n = 13) or mitral (n = 10) regurgitation. Quantification by MRI was fro m a section corresponding to the four-chamber view. In aortic regurgit ation, maximal regurgitant jet area (JA), ratio of JA to left-ventricu lar area (JA/LVA) were measured, while in mitral regurgitation, the ra tio of JA to left atrial area (JA/LAA) was measured, as well as jet vo lume (JV) and the ratio of JV to the corresponding volume of the recei ving chamber (JV/LVV or JV/LVA). The results were compared with corres ponding measurement obtained by CDE in the four-chamber view. The degr ee of regurgitation was graded as small if JA/LVA or JA/LAA, respectiv ely, was less than 0.2, moderate if 0.2-0.4, and marked if more than 0 .4. In the patients with aortic regurgitation the correlation between the two methods was r = 0.91 regarding the jet area, 0.93 regarding JA /LVA and 0.92 regarding JV/LVV and JA/LVA. For mitral regurgitation th e r values were 0.93 for JA, 0.89 for JA/LAA, and 0.85 for JV/LAV to J A/LAA. The grading of aortic regurgitation by MRI and CDE agreed in 12 of 13 patients (92%), and in nine of ten (90%) with mitral regurgitat ion (deviation by one degree of severity in each). These data indicate that quantification of aortic and mitral regurgitation gives similar results with MRI and CDE: thus, MRI is an equal substitute to CDE in p atients with inadequate conditions for sonography.