Kw. Johnston et al., RUPTURED ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM - 6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE-STUDY, Journal of vascular surgery, 19(5), 1994, pp. 888-900
Purpose: On the basis of a prospective analysis of 147 patients underg
oing surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and recorded
in the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery Aneurysm Registry, this
study defines the early and 6-year actuarial survival rates and determ
ines the predictive variables that are associated with survival. Metho
ds: Ongoing follow-up of a cohort of patients was current at the time
of analysis. To identify the preoperative, intraoperative, and postope
rative variables that were associated with survival, statistical metho
ds included chi-squared analysis, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan
-Meier analysis, and Cox regression analysis. Results: The survival ra
te was 48.6% at 1 month, 34.7% +/- 4.2% at 3 years, and 22.0% +/- 4.0%
at 6 years. When preoperative and intraoperative variables were consi
dered and logistic regression analysis was used, the highest probabili
ty of early in-hospital survival was associated with preoperative crea
tinine levels of 1.3 mg/dl or less, intraoperative urine output of 200
mi or greater, and infrarenal clamp site. The highest probability of
late survival, as calculated by the Cox proportional hazards method, w
as predicted by the patient's age and total urine output during the pr
ocedure. When all variables, including postoperative complications, we
re considered, late survival was highest if intraoperative urine outpu
t was 200 mi or greater and respiratory failure and myocardial infarct
ion did not occur. For those patients with ruptured AAA who survived o
peration (i.e., greater than 1 month), the long-term survival rate was
significantly lower than a comparable group undergoing repair of nonr
uptured AAA. Conclusions: Patients who survive repair of a ruptured AA
A have a lower late survival rate than patients undergoing elective re
pair. When a patient is evaluated before operation, no combination of
preoperative variables could identify those patients with little or no
chance of survival; hence, the decision to repair a ruptured AAA shou
ld be made on clinical grounds. However, after surgery (when informati
on on intraoperative and postoperative variables is also available), t
he results of this study provide a basis for the surgeon to use these
prognostic variables to assist clinical judgment and guide discussions
on prognosis with the family and to identify those patients who have
such a low chance of early and late survival that further aggressive t
reatment may be futile.