AUTOGENOUS VEIN GRAFTS FOR FEMOROFEMORAL REVASCULARIZATION IN CONTAMINATED OR INFECTED FIELDS

Citation
Ag. Hakaim et al., AUTOGENOUS VEIN GRAFTS FOR FEMOROFEMORAL REVASCULARIZATION IN CONTAMINATED OR INFECTED FIELDS, Journal of vascular surgery, 19(5), 1994, pp. 912-915
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
07415214
Volume
19
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
912 - 915
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(1994)19:5<912:AVGFFR>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the indications an d the long-term results for femorofemoral revascularization with autog enous vein grafts (AVG) rather than conventional synthetic materials. Methods: A consecutive series of 13 men and 12 women (mean age 64 year s) receiving femorofemoral AVG was collected during a retrospective re view of our experience from 1979 to 1992. Sixteen of these 25 patients required revascularization for acute ischemia in the presence of pote ntial groin contamination (group 1), and the remaining nine had frank infections involving previous synthetic grafts (group 2). New grafts w ere constructed with the greater saphenous vein in 23 patients (92%) a nd with the cephalic vein in two. Results: One patient in each group ( 8%) died after operation with patent grafts. Preoperative and postoper ative ankle/brachial indexes (ABI) were available for 12 patients in g roup 1 and for seven patients in group 2. There was significant improv ement in the ABI among 11 patients with ischemia in group 1 (mean 0.33 +/- 0.13; p = 0.0001), whereas no change in the ABI occurred in conju nction with the replacement of patent infected grafts among six patien ts in group 2 (mean 0.04 +/- 0.17; p = NS). One patient from each grou p sustained a reduction in postoperative ABI for the recipient limb de spite a patent AVG. Cumulative 3-year survival and primary patency est imates for all 23 operative survivors were 63% and 75%, respectively. Late results seemed to be comparable in group 1 and group 2, but each contained too few patients for adequate analysis. Conclusions: Despite their infrequent use, AVG seem to represent a reasonable alternative to synthetic bypass for femorofemoral revascularization in patients ha ving either contaminated wounds or established graft infections.