G. Lantz et al., 3-DIMENSIONAL LOCALIZATION OF INTERICTAL EPILEPTIFORM ACTIVITY WITH DIPOLE ANALYSIS - COMPARISON WITH INTRACRANIAL RECORDINGS AND SPECT FINDINGS, Journal of epilepsy, 7(2), 1994, pp. 117-129
Seventeen patients with therapy-resistant partial epilepsy were studie
d in order to compare the localization of the epileptic focus provided
by three-dimensional dipole analysis of scalp interictal epileptiform
EEG activity to the localization of the ictal pacemaker zone obtained
by intracranial recordings. The results were also compared with regio
nal abnormalities in interictal Tc-99m-hexamethylpropylenenamine oxime
single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Dipole analysis w
as performed using a well-known commercial computer program based on a
three-shell model. For 12 of the 17 patients, the dipoles for all the
individual spikes were located in the same area, in two cases, two se
parate locations were found, and in three cases the dipoles were scatt
ered over a large area. In 8 of the 12 patients with a single dipole l
ocation, intracranial ictal recordings revealed a seizure initiation z
one corresponding to the dipole location. In another two cases, intrao
perative corticography confirmed the dipole findings. In the two remai
ning patients, the intracranial recordings revealed a different patter
n of seizure initiation than had been anticipated from the dipole anal
ysis. In one of the two patients with two dipole locations, intracrani
al recordings revealed a seizure initiation zone corresponding to one
of the two dipole location sites, whereas in the other patient the sei
zure onset pattern was more complex. In two of the three patients with
widely scattered dipole areas, seizure onset was complex, whereas in
the third patient a localized seizure onset was found. In 10 of the 12
patients with a single dipole location site, there was good correlati
on between this site and regions of low flow in the interictal SPECT m
easurements. In both patients with two dipole areas, there was a low f
low area corresponding to at least one of the dipole localizations. In
two of the three patients with widespread dipoles, there were major S
PECT low-flow areas, whereas in the third patient interictal SPECT was
normal. Although our investigations so far are tentative, we think th
e results indicate that dipole analysis of interictal epileptiform EEG
activity may become a useful supplementary method for the localizatio
n of the epileptogenic region in patients who are under consideration
for surgical therapy, especially ff combined with SPECT or other indep
endent localizing techniques.