Cm. Blacker et al., UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY - EVALUATION OF THE LUTEAL-PHASE - RESULTS OFTHE NATIONAL-CENTER-FOR-INFERTILITY-RESEARCH AT MICHIGAN, Fertility and sterility, 67(3), 1997, pp. 437-442
Objective: To evaluate the luteal phase in women with rigorously defin
ed unexplained infertility. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Nation
al Center for Infertility Research at Michigan. Patient(s): Evaluation
of 1,885 women with infertility identified 12 women who met the rigor
ously defined criteria for unexplained infertility: [I] infertility of
greater than or equal to 24 months duration, with no male factor, ana
tomic-functional disorders of the reproductive tract, or immunologic i
nfertility; [2] normal body mass index (BMI); [3] ovulatory cycles ran
ging from 26 to 32 days; [4] normal luteal phase determined by endomet
rial biopsy; and [5] normal baseline hormonal profile. Controls (n = 1
2) were healthy, parous women with normal ovulatory cycles, normal hor
monal screen, and were matched for age and BMI to patients. Main Outco
me Measure(s): Pattern of follicular growth rate and luteal phase horm
onal profile. Result(s): Women with unexplained infertility did not di
ffer in menstrual cycle characteristics, follicular growth rate or mea
n preovulatory follicle diameter, or endometrial biopsy dating. The me
an levels of P tended to be lower in the unexplained infertility group
throughout the luteal phase, but only the midluteal interval reached
statistical significance. Luteal phase mean integrated P or urinary PD
G levels of unexplained infertility women did not differ from those of
fertile controls. The ratio of integrated Ep:P also was significantly
greater in women with unexplained infertility than in fertile control
s. Conclusion(s): Women with rigorously defined unexplained infertilit
y have subtle hormonal anomalies during the luteal phase when compared
with fertile controls.