The article discusses the relationship between Durkheim's theories and
contemporary research on the effects of marriage and family on suicid
e risks, health, and well-being. It is shown that Durkheim's theories
seem to have bad little direct impact on contemporary work in this are
a. In particular, his theory of marriage as protection against sexual
anomie has largely been neglected. Next, the power of Durkheim's theor
ies in explaining contemporary empirical findings on the relationships
between marriage and family, on the one hand, and suicide, health, an
d well-being, on the other, is discussed. The relationship between mar
ital status and suicide or well-being now seems to be very similar for
both men and women. Although different from Durkheim's findings, this
is easily accounted for within a Durkheimian perspective. As hypothes
ized by Durkheim, a recent study also provides strong evidence that wo
men with children have much lower suicide rates than women without chi
ldren. The major problem for Durkheim's theories is that dramatic incr
eases in divorce rates have not been accompanied by a weakening of the
association between marital status and suicide or well-being. It is p
ossible, however, that a weakening of the effects of marriage due to i
ncreased opportunities for divorce has been counterbalanced by other s
ocial changes that have served to strengthen the effects of marriage.