E. Marrapodi et al., EFFECTS OF DEFIBROTIDE ON PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE AND HEMORHEOLOGIC PICTURE IN PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL ARTERIOPATHY, Clinical trials and meta-analysis, 29(1), 1994, pp. 21-30
In a random double-blind study versus placebo, 60 ambulatory patients
with peripheral occlusive disease of the lower limbs and claudicatio i
ntermittens (Leriche's stage 2), were treated for 60 days with defibro
tide (400 mg b.i.d., oral, n = 30) or placebo (n = 30). Patients in th
e defibrotide group received additional treatment with the same drug a
t the reduced rate of 400 mg once daily for another 120 days for maint
enance (total treatment duration 180 days). All patients were assessed
at intake and 60 days for relative and absolute walking distance (RWD
and AWD) in a standard treadmill test and for the Winsor Index (WI) a
t rest and after exercise; patients of the defibrotide treatment group
were retested in the same way at 90-180 days. In a subgroup of patien
ts (defibrotide = 11, placebo = 12), blood samples were obtained for t
he assessment of whole blood and plasma viscosity at intake and after
60 days of treatment. These samples could not be collected properly in
the remaining cases, for technical reasons. At day 60, we compared th
e effects of the two treatments on physical performance: mean (SE) val
ues of RWD were for defibrotide 148 (9.7) and 179 (12.4) m in basal an
d post-treatment conditions, respectively, and 209 (16.2) and 212 (17.
1) m for placebo. Similar changes were observed for AWD: for defibroti
de 206 (13.4) and 241 (15.2) m and for placebo 270 (22.9) and 272 (23.
1) m. The mean changes were significantly larger with defibrotide: for
RWD +33 (7.1) vs. +0.3 (3.8) m (p < 0.01) and for AWD +34 (9.2) and -
2 (6.6) m (p < 0.01). The overall gain of walking distance after maint
enance therapy with the reduced defibrotide dosage amounted to approxi
mately +50% over basal (after 180 days). Blood and plasma viscosity im
proved in patients on defibrotide but the change fell short of statist
ical significance versus placebo. All findings confirm the potential u
sefulness of defibrotide in the treatment of peripheral arterial disea
se, at the same time encouraging further studies of the involved mecha
nisms of action.