Jf. Bergmann et al., A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF THE EFFECT OF INFORMED CONSENT ON THE ANALGESIC ACTIVITY OF PLACEBO AND NAPROXEN IN CANCER PAIN, Clinical trials and meta-analysis, 29(1), 1994, pp. 41-47
To determine whether informed consent in a therapeutic trial modifies
the analgesic effect of naproxen and placebo, we conducted a prospecti
ve, randomised, single dose, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were r
andomly selected to receive or not information concerning the study. A
ll patients included were then given a single dose of naproxen and pla
cebo according to a crossover, double-blind design. Forty-nine patient
s with mild or moderate cancer pain which did not need narcotic analge
sics entered the study. Twenty-five received both treatments without a
ny information and constituted the uninformed group. Twenty-four had a
complete information about the trial; six refused to participate. The
18 others constituted the informed-consent group. Visual analogue sca
les of pain before and 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after the intake of nap
roxen and placebo were recorded. As an analgesic, naproxen was more ef
fective than placebo in both groups of patients (p = 0.001). For napro
xen as well as for placebo, the analgesic effect was better in the inf
ormed-consent group compared to the uninformed group (p = 0.012). The
difference in therapeutic activity between naproxen and placebo was mo
derately higher in the uninformed patients (p = 0.08). We concluded th
at, in contrast with parallel studies, giving information in a crossov
er, placebo-controlled trial may increase the apparent efficacy of bot
h the tested agent and the placebo, and decrease the perceived differe
nce between the two.