Background: The study analyses a standardized, risk-adapted radiothera
py for stage IE-IIE primary extranodal lymphoma of the stomach and bow
el. Methods: Sixty eight patients (31 females, 37 males, median age 56
years) were treated from 1987-1992 in 15 centers. Fifty six patients
had gastric and 12 patients had bowel lymphomas. Gastric lymphomas (lo
w or intermediate grade stage I-II: 38 patients/high grade stage I: 18
patients) were treated by whole abdominal irradiation (25/30 Gy), boo
ster dose to involved field (30/40 Gy) and additional boost to macrosc
opic residual lymphoma (40/50 Gy). Surgery consisted of gastrectomy (1
9 patients), partial gastric resection (30) or biopsy (7). In 8/18 sta
ge II patients, supradiaphragmal irradiation was added. In 10/12 patie
nts with bowel lymphoma, segment resection was performed, two received
biopsy only. Radiation doses equalled those used for gastric lymphoma
. Results: In 51/56 patients (91%) with gastric lymphoma, the recommen
ded dose for whole abdominal irradiation was given. A total of 40/56 p
atients (71%) received the required dose to the upper abdominal region
, in 22/56 patients (39%) a booster dose for residual disease was appl
ied. Five-year overall survival was 87%, 5-year disease-fret survival
84%. Of nine relapses, two were in the gastric stump of low grade pati
ents after reinfection with Helicobacter pylori. Three infield, intraa
bdominal relapses were observed in intermediate and high grade lymphom
a, all other relapses were outfield. Eleven patients experienced late
toxicity (bowel obstruction after laparatomy and irradiation, four pat
ients; chronic gastritis, three patients; asymptomatic left kidney atr
ophy, two patients; asymptomatic hepathopathia, two patients). In bowe
l lymphoma, 5-year disease-free survival was 65%. Conclusion: This stu
dy demonstrates the high efficacy of risk-adapted radiotherapy in gast
ric lymphoma. Iii low grade gastric lymphoma, whole abdominal irradiat
ion may be reduced in dose or omitted. Total gastrectomy does not impr
ove results and should therefore be avoided if possible. (C) 1997, Els
evier Science Ireland Ltd.