HOW ACCURATE ARE ENDOSCOPIC ESTIMATES OF SIZE

Citation
C. Margulies et al., HOW ACCURATE ARE ENDOSCOPIC ESTIMATES OF SIZE, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 40(2), 1994, pp. 174-177
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00165107
Volume
40
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Part
1
Pages
174 - 177
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5107(1994)40:2<174:HAAEEO>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The accuracy of polyp size estimations in clinical studies is not know n. This study was designed to evaluate how well endoscopists can estim ate the size of objects at endoscopy. Observations were made by six at tending gastroenterologists, six gastroenterology fellows, and seven u ntrained medical residents. Ball bearings ranging in size from 3 mm to 19 mm were randomly inserted into a latex colon model, and size was e stimated while being viewed with a video colonoscope with and without the aid of an open biopsy forceps. Estimated size correlated well to a ctual size (R ranged from 0.78 to 0.93), although the mean estimates w ere consistently lower (13% to 29%) than the actual size for all group s, with and without forceps. The use of forceps did not improve the es timates. Exactly correct estimates occurred in 8%; errors of as much a s 110% were recorded. The 12 mm bearing was estimated to be less than 10 mm half of the time. We conclude that endoscopists frequently under estimate the size of objects viewed at the time of endoscopy. There wa s no difference in the performance of experienced gastroenterologists, fellows in training, or untrained residents. This study indicates tha t better methods of training and for determining size are needed. Rese arch that depends on endoscopic estimates of polyp size may be biased.