J. Apelqvist et al., DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS IN A MULTIDISCIPLINARY SETTING - AN ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY HEALING AND HEALING WITH AMPUTATION, Journal of internal medicine, 235(5), 1994, pp. 463-471
Objectives. To perform an economic analysis of primary healing and hea
ling with amputation in diabetic patients with foot ulcers. Design. A
retrospective economic analysis based on a prospective study of consec
utively presenting diabetic patients admitted to the Department of Int
ernal Medicine because of foot ulcer. Setting. A multidisciplinary foo
t-care team. Subjects. A total of 314 consecutively presenting diabeti
c patients with foot ulcers. Forty patients died before healing occurr
ed. In those patients who healed primarily (n = 197) or after amputati
on (n = 77), a retrospective economic analysis was performed. Interven
tions. All patients were treated by a multidisciplinary foot care team
consisting of diabetologist, orthopaedic surgeon, diabetes nurse, pod
iatrist and orthotist both as in- and out-patients. The patients were
followed by the team from admittance until final outcome, i.e. primary
healing or healing with amputation or death. Main outcome measures. D
ata from both the prospectively collected patient material and from pa
tient records were used to estimate the cost for hospital care, antibi
otics, surgery, out-patient care, staff attendance, drugs and material
for ulcer dressings, and orthopaedic appliances. Results. The total c
osts were SEK 51000 (3000-808000) for patients with primary healing an
d SEK 344000 (27000-992000) for healing with amputation. Costs for in-
patient care were 37% of total average costs for primary healing and 8
2% for patients with amputation. The costs for topical treatment of th
e ulcers in out-patient care were 45% of the total average cost for pr
imary healed and 13% for patients who healed with amputation. The cost
s for products used for ulcer dressings were 21% of total costs for to
pical treatment, i.e. 9% and 3% of total average costs for primary hea
ling and healing with amputation, respectively. Costs for visits to th
e foot care team, antibiotics and orthopaedic appliances were low in r
elation to total costs. Conclusion. Treatment of diabetic patients wit
h foot ulcers in a multidisciplinary system was associated with relati
vely low costs. Healing with amputation was associated with high costs
mainly due to multiple and extended hospitalization. These findings i
ndicate the potential cost savings of preventive and multidisciplinary
foot care.