MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF HUMAN ENDOTHELIN RECEPTORS ET(A) AND ET(B) - IDENTIFICATION OF REGIONS INVOLVED IN THE SELECTIVITY FOR ENDOTHELIN-3 OR CYCLO-(D-TRP-D-ASP-PRO-D-VAL-LEU)
A. Becker et al., MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF HUMAN ENDOTHELIN RECEPTORS ET(A) AND ET(B) - IDENTIFICATION OF REGIONS INVOLVED IN THE SELECTIVITY FOR ENDOTHELIN-3 OR CYCLO-(D-TRP-D-ASP-PRO-D-VAL-LEU), European journal of biochemistry, 221(3), 1994, pp. 951-958
Two endothelin(ET)-receptor subtypes have been identified in mammals.
They differ in their affinity towards the ET isopeptides with ET(A) di
splaying an ET-1-selective profile and ET(B) a nonselective one. To id
entify the regions responsible for the differential selectivity, chime
ric forms were engineered by sequentially exchanging extracellular reg
ions together with their flanking transmembrane domains. Two sets of r
eciprocal receptor mutants were thereby generated and analysed by expr
ession in COS-7 cells. The recombinant receptor chimeras were characte
rised by direct and competitive radioligand-binding analysis. COS-7 ce
lls transfected with vectors for the mutant receptors exhibited specif
ic saturable [3-I-125]iodotyrosyl ET-1 (I-125-ET-1) binding, with affi
nities comparable to those of the wild-type receptors (apparent K-i ap
proximate to 1-6 x 10(-9)M). An average of 10(5)-10(6) binding sites/c
ell was calculated for the wild-type and mutant forms. In competition
experiments using I-125-ET-1 and unlabeled ET-3, an ET(B)-selective ag
onist, we detected a clear switch from an ET-1-selective profile to a
non-isopeptide-selective profile in ETS chimeras where the second extr
acellular loop and the flanking transmembrane domains IV and V or the
third extracellular loop and the flanking transmembrane domains VI and
VII, had been exchanged for the corresponding parts of ET(B). The opp
osite effect, namely a switch from a non-isopeptide-selective to an ET
-1-selective binding, was observed for the mirror ET(A) chimeras where
the symmetrical exchange had been operated. Using I-125-ET-1 and the
ET(A)-specific antagonist cyclo-(D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu) (BQ123), w
e were able to map the main determinants responsible for this selectiv
ity to the N-terminal moiety of this receptor. Therefore, the ability
for the interaction with ET-3 or BQ123 is governed by two different re
gions of the ET receptors.