The motivation of this paper rests on the attempts by some groups of c
ountries to coordinate their macroeconomic policies. Implicit in these
attempts is the notion that coordination by at least some countries i
s better than zero coordination. We use a dynamic general equilibrium
model of international coordination to study the properties of a parti
al coordination scheme. We find that, indeed, some coordination is Par
eto superior to zero coordination. Although a free-riding incentive pr
oblem arises in partial coordination schemes, such schemes are sustain
able provided the relative size of the coalition is chosen ''appropria
tely.''