Mc. Harris et al., AN ON-SITE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT FLOTATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR FINE COAL BENEFICIATION, Minerals engineering, 7(5-6), 1994, pp. 699-714
This paper presents the results of an investigation of the performance
of a number of different flotation cell technologies for the benefici
ation of fine coal. The work was conducted on-site at the Grootegeluk
Colliery in the northern Transvaal province of South Africa, using a p
ilot-scale conventional column cell, a pilot-scale Jameson-type cell,
and an air-sparged hydrocyclone (ASH). In addition, characterisation a
nd conventional batch flotation tests were conducted in the laboratory
in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Cape T
own. All three units tested on-site demonstrated improved selectivity
compared to conventional subaeration flotation. In the column cell, op
timum performance could only be achieved at very low throughputs. Subs
tantial losses of coal occurred in the coarser size fractions. The Jam
eson-type cell was able to operate effectively at about double the thr
oughput of the column cell at similar recoveries. Coal recovery in the
coarser size fractions was still poor, but better than that of the co
lumn cell. The ASH was characterised by a very high throughput, more t
han 150 times that of the column cell on the basis of solids capacity
per unit cross-sectional area. However, the ASH required more than thr
ee times the reagent dosage of the other two units to achieve this. Th
e ASH performed particularly well in the recovery of the coarser size
fractions, but was less effective than the other cells on the finer si
ze fractions. Overall, the best performance for this application was t
hat of the Jameson cell, owing to its higher capacity in comparison to
the column cell. The high reagent requirement of the ASH makes this t
echnology uneconomic in this application.