Cc. Krueger et al., GENETIC-VARIATION IN NATURALIZED RAINBOW-TROUT (ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS) FROM MINNESOTA TRIBUTARIES TO LAKE-SUPERIOR, Journal of Great Lakes research, 20(1), 1994, pp. 299-316
Genetic variation at 27 polymorphic loci that code allozymes was compa
red among collections of naturalized, anadromous-form rainbow trout (O
ncorhynchus mykiss) from Lake Superior tributaries in Minnesota and am
ong four hatchery strains. Genetic differences were observed among col
lections from naturalized populations from tributary streams and among
hatchery strains (P < 0.01). In naturalized populations, most genetic
variation observed occurred among individuals within samples (95.5%)
and was comparable to values reported for other naturalized Lake Super
ior populations of rainbow trout. Cluster analysis of genetic distance
coefficients revealed two main groups. One group included a subgroup
of samples from heavily stocked streams (Devil Track, Flute Reed, and
Baptism rivers) and the Michigan hatchery strain which had been used t
o stock these streams. The second group included collections from the
Knife River drainage and Knife River hatchery fish. Collections from I
ndian Camp Creek and of the ''kamloops'' hatchery strain were the most
differentiated of the samples and showed little genetic affinity to e
ach other or the two main groups. The ''kamloops'' strain did not exhi
bit allelic frequencies expected for rainbow trout derived from the Ka
mloops region of the upper Fraser River of British Columbia. No eviden
ce was found to support the contention that the ''kamloops'' hatchery
strain had interbred with wild populations. Widespread stocking of Mic
higan strain fish may have reduced genetic differences among naturaliz
ed, wild populations along Minnesota's Lake Superior shoreline. Popula
tion-specific management of rainbow trout by tributary is a justifiabl
e approach to consider. If maintenance of the genetic differences amon
g the wild, naturalized populations is desired, ''kamloops'' and the M
ichigan hatchery strains should not be stocked. Stocking programs inst
ead should use gametes from returning adults of a river for subsequent
juvenile propagation and stocking back into the same river.