Study objective: To evaluate the efficacy of three methods by which re
scuers can breathe supplemental oxygen to increase their delivered oxy
gen concentration (FDO2) during single-rescuer, bystander-initiated CP
R. Design: Controlled, randomized, crossover study. Setting: Simulatio
n in laboratory setting using a CPR manikin. Subjects: Thirteen-volunt
eer convenience sample group. interventions: Volunteers trained only i
n basic life support performed ventilation only and full CPR on a CPR
manikin using room air and each of three supplemental oxygen delivery
methods: nasal cannula, oxygen supply tube, and demand valve. The volu
nteers received minimal instruction on how to use the supplemental oxy
gen delivery methods. Main outcome measures: Peak FDO2 and peak carbon
dioxide concentration; American Heart Association-defined ventilation
and CPR compression performance indices. The data were analyzed using
Duncan's method of analysis of variance. Results: The mean peak FDO2
during ventilation-only/full CPR for the baseline (room air ventilatio
n) and each supplemental oxygen delivery method (at specified flow rat
e) was: baseline (room air), -17.96% +/- 0.56%/16.77% +/- 0.56%; nasal
cannula (at 10 L/min), -31.77% +/- 3.06%/27.01% +/- 3.68%; oxygen sup
ply tubing (at 15 L/min), -36.82% +/- 9.93%/30.41% +/- 4.88%; and dema
nd valve, -78.17% +/- 9.10%/68.22% +/- 7.10%. CPR performance was not
hampered by the use of the supplemental oxygen methods. Conclusion: Th
e use of supplemental oxygen increases the rescuer's FDO2 during venti
lation-only and full CPR without interfering with CPR performance.