Jm. Kerns et al., ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF NERVE REGENERATION IN THE RAT - FUNCTIONAL-EVALUATION BY A TWITCH TENSION METHOD, Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 6(3), 1994, pp. 175-180
The effect of D.C. electrical fields on in vivo nerve regeneration fol
lowing rat sciatic nerve transection was assessed by a toe-twitch tens
ion method for motor recovery. Two groups for baseline comparisons rec
eived either a nerve transection and a neutral battery implant or a ne
rve crush and no implant. Two treatment groups each received a nerve t
ransection and an implant delivering either cathodal (-10 mu A) or ano
dal (+10 mu A) current via electrodes positioned on either side of the
transection site. The contralateral nerve was exposed but not given a
lesion. The functional recovery was assessed at weekly intervals by c
omparing the amplitude and area of the twitch tension curves on both s
ides, expressed as a ratio (index of motor recovery = IMR). By 28-35 d
ays postoperative (dpo) the crushed/untreated group had mean IMR value
s not significantly different than the preoperative values. The transe
cted/neutral group appeared to have the worst recovery throughout the
study. Compared to these two groups, both the cathodal and anodal trea
tment groups with a transected nerve showed intermediate IMR values, b
ut by 63 dpo the group differences were less. These results indicate t
hat following a nerve transection lesion steady D.C. electrical fields
may temporarily enhance the,early functional recovery of motor nerve
regeneration compared to conventional nerve repair alone.