IMPROVING INFORMATION FOR NUCLEAR-MEDICINE DEPARTMENT OUTPATIENTS

In two large inner city hospitals we have conducted a survey of the le tters sent to patients before their attendance at a nuclear medicine d epartment. The majority of questions asked for a graded answer (poor, fair, ok, good, excellent). Patients were handed the survey form when they had completed their test and the survey was continued until 100 v alid replies had been received at each hospital. Information leaflets, as recommended by the British Nuclear Medicine Society (BNMS), were s ubsequently issued to all patients and at one hospital the patient inf ormation letters were rewritten. The surveys were then repeated. There was a significant (P<0.001) improvement in patient satisfaction with the information provided. In some areas, for example, instructions abo ut getting to the hospital, no different information was provided and there was no change between the surveys, as would be expected. Curious ly, questions allowing free text answers were more often completed by patients from Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham, than from Guy's Hospit al, London. Some possible explanations for this difference are discuss ed. Particularly reassuring was that more women understood about preca utions regarding pregnancy or breastfeeding as a result of the leaflet s. We would recommend the advice of the BNMS to other nuclear medicine departments.