EXPERIENCE WITH ASSISTED FERTILIZATION IN SEVERE MALE FACTOR INFERTILITY AND UNEXPLAINED FAILED FERTILIZATION IN-VITRO

Citation
Cj. Redgment et al., EXPERIENCE WITH ASSISTED FERTILIZATION IN SEVERE MALE FACTOR INFERTILITY AND UNEXPLAINED FAILED FERTILIZATION IN-VITRO, Human reproduction, 9(4), 1994, pp. 680-683
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02681161
Volume
9
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
680 - 683
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(1994)9:4<680:EWAFIS>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
We present results of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using assist ed fertilization at our centre. Assisted fertilization was performed i n those couples who had failed to fertilize oocytes with conventional IVF, or where this was predicted by the presence of severe male factor infertility. In 20 consecutive assisted fertilization cycles 223 oocy tes were subjected exclusively to subzonal insemination (SUZI). Subseq uently in 32 consecutive assisted fertilization cycles 418 oocytes wer e subjected to intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). More oocytes were damaged by ICSI (8.9%) than by SUZI (2.3%) (P = 0.03), but normal fertilization resulted more often after ICSI (56.9%) than SUZI (35.8% ) (P = 0.004). Sperm parameters, other than sufficient numbers to perf orm the procedures, had no effect on fertilization or pregnancy rates. Every cycle led to the transfer of at least one embryo. Pregnancy res ulted from eight of the SUZI cycles (40%) and nine of the ICSI cycles (28%). Implantation rates were calculated as 25 and 12% for SUZI and I CSI respectively. The presence of living spermatozoa is the only semen parameter limiting assisted fertilization. At present more centres ar e able to perform SUZI than ICSI and we feel it is premature to abando n SUZI altogether. Local conditions and success rates should be consid ered when decisions are made in assisted fertilization cycles.