Feeding behaviour of the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae, was mon
itored electronically on two resistant Brassica species, B. fruticulos
a and B. spinescens, and compared with a susceptible control B. olerac
ea var. capitata cv. Offenham Compacta. Aphids, monitored for 10 h on
the under side of leaves, performed recognizable feeding behaviour on
all species. Electrical Penetration Graphs (EPGs) of aphids on resista
nt and susceptible plants showed no difference in behaviour for aphids
on resistant Brassica species compared to susceptible until stylets p
enetrated the phloem sieve elements when a large reduction in the dura
tion of passive phloem uptake (E(2) pattern) on B. fruticulosa was ind
icated. Although feeding behaviour on 6 week-old plants of B. spinesce
ns was similar to the susceptible controls, behaviour on 10 week-old p
lants was similar to that recorded for B. fruticulosa. The mechanism o
f resistance is thought to be located in the sieve element as the norm
al sieve element salivation (E(1)) signal was either quickly terminate
d by withdrawal of the stylets from the sieve element or continued as
a disrupted E(2) pattern. Analysis of secondary plant compounds in the
three Brassica species only identified significant differences in the
glucosinolate profile. No reproducible differences were detected in t
he concentration of phenolics or anthocyanins. The major glucosinolate
component of B. fruticulosa and B. spinescens was gluconapin rather t
han glucobrassicin and glucoiberin as found in the susceptible host pl
ant. However, both pure glucosinolates and glucosinolate extracts from
all three species did not reduce aphid survival on chemically-defined
artificial diets. These results suggest that the mechanism of resista
nce may be a mechanical blocking of the sieve element or stylets rathe
r than a difference in the secondary plant chemistry of glucosinolates
and phenolics.