E. Steiner et al., IMAGING OF PAROTID TUMORS - US VERSUS MRI, RoFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der neuenbildgebenden Verfahren, 160(5), 1994, pp. 397-405
27 patients, clinically suspected of having parotid tumours, were exam
ined prospectively by sonography (high frequency linear array) and MRI
(1.5T, T1- and T2-weighted SE sequences before, and T1-weighted SE se
quences after contrast). In 23 patients, 25 intraglandular tumours wer
e demonstrated (two were multicentric); they consisted of 6 malignant
parotid tumours, 11 pleomorphic adenomas, 7 cystadenolymphomas and one
oncocytic adenoma. 4 patients had extraglandular tumours. All tumours
were demonstrated by either method, but two extraglandular tumours we
re incorrectly diagnosed by sonography as being intraglandular and 8 t
umours (28 %) were not completely delineated by sonography. MRI locali
sed the tumours correctly in all cases and demonstrated all lesions ac
curately, independent of their position or size. In summary, sonograph
y appears suitable as the primary imaging method in the investigation
of parotid tumours but in case of large, parapharyngeal or malignant t
umours, MRI is clearly superior to sonography.