REFERENCE POINTS FOR COMPARISONS OF 2-DIMENSIONAL MAPS OF PROTEINS FROM DIFFERENT HUMAN CELL-TYPES DEFINED IN A PH SCALE WHERE ISOELECTRIC POINTS CORRELATE WITH POLYPEPTIDE COMPOSITIONS
B. Bjellqvist et al., REFERENCE POINTS FOR COMPARISONS OF 2-DIMENSIONAL MAPS OF PROTEINS FROM DIFFERENT HUMAN CELL-TYPES DEFINED IN A PH SCALE WHERE ISOELECTRIC POINTS CORRELATE WITH POLYPEPTIDE COMPOSITIONS, Electrophoresis, 15(3-4), 1994, pp. 529-539
A highly reproducible, commercial and nonlinear, wide-range immobilize
d pH gradient (IPG) was used to generate two-dimensional (2-D) gel map
s of [S-35]methionine-labeled proteins from noncultured, unfractionate
d normal human epidermal keratinocytes. Forty one proteins, common to
most human cell types and recorded in the human keratinocyte 2-D gel p
rotein database were identified in the 2-D gel maps and their isoelect
ric points (pI) were determined using narrow-range IPGs. The latter es
tablished a pH scale that allowed comparisons between 2-D gel maps gen
erated either with other IPGs in the first dimension or with different
human protein samples. Of the 41 proteins identified, a subset of 18
was defined as suitable to evaluate the correlation between calculated
and experimental pI values for polypeptides with known composition. T
he variance calculated for the discrepancies between calculated and ex
perimental pI values for these proteins was 0.001 pH units. Comparison
of the values by the t-test for dependent samples (paired test) gave
a p-level of 0.49, indicating that there is no significant difference
between the calculated and experimental pi values. The precision of th
e calculated values depended on the buffer capacity of the proteins, a
nd on average, it improved with increased buffer capacity. As shown he
re, the widely available information on protein sequences cannot, a pr
iori, be assumed to be sufficient for calculating pI values because po
st-translational modifications, in particular N-terminal blockage, pos
e a major problem. Of the 36 proteins analyzed in this study, 18-20 we
re found to be N-terminally blocked and of these only 6 were indicated
as such in databases. The probability of N-terminal blockage depended
on the nature of the N-terminal group. Twenty six of the proteins had
either M, S or A as N-terminal amino acids and of these 17-19 were bl
ocked. Only 1 in 10 proteins containing other N-terminal groups were b
locked.