STROKE RISK AFTER ABRUPT INTERNAL CAROTID-ARTERY SACRIFICE - ACCURACYOF PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT WITH BALLOON TEST OCCLUSION AND STABLE XENON-ENHANCED CT
Me. Linskey et al., STROKE RISK AFTER ABRUPT INTERNAL CAROTID-ARTERY SACRIFICE - ACCURACYOF PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT WITH BALLOON TEST OCCLUSION AND STABLE XENON-ENHANCED CT, American journal of neuroradiology, 15(5), 1994, pp. 829-843
Citations number
94
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
PURPOSE: To evaluate stable xenon-enhanced CT cerebral blood flow with
balloon test occlusion as a predictor of stroke risk in internal caro
tid artery sacrifice. METHODS: Abrupt internal carotid artery occlusio
n was performed by surgical or endovascular means below the origin of
the ophthalmic artery in 31 normotensive patients who were assessed pr
eoperatively by a 15-minute clinical balloon test occlusion followed b
y an internal carotid artery-occluded xenon CT cerebral blood flow stu
dy. RESULTS: One patient, who passed the clinical test occlusion but e
xhibited regions of cerebral blood flow less than 30 mL/100 g per minu
te on the occlusion xenon CT cerebral blood flow study went on to have
a fatal stroke corresponding exactly to the region of reduced blood f
low. Thirty patients passed both components of the preoperative stroke
-risk assessment. Neuroimaging demonstrated possible flow-related infa
rctions, which subsequently developed in three patients. Two patients
were asymptomatic, and one patient was left with a mild residual hemip
aresis. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol provided a statistically significant
reduction in subsequent infarction rate and infarction-related death
rate when compared with a control group of normotensive abrupt interna
l carotid artery occlusion patients who did not undergo any preoperati
ve stroke-risk assessment (reported in the literature). The estimated
false-negative rate for our preoperative assessment protocol ranged fr
om 3.3% to 10% depending on the assessment of the cause of the three p
otentially flow-related infarctions. Although life-threatening major v
ascular territory infarctions have been avoided, our protocol is less
sensitive to changes predicting smaller, often minimally symptomatic,
vascular border lone infarctions and does not predict postoperative th
romboembolic strokes.