Dj. Mckeefry et al., THE ACTIVITY IN HUMAN AREAS V1 V2, V3, AND V5 DURING THE PERCEPTION OF COHERENT AND INCOHERENT MOTION/, NeuroImage, 5(1), 1997, pp. 1-12
We have used the technique of positron emission tomography to study an
d compare the cortical activity produced when humans view a pattern of
small squares moving incoherently with respect to one another and whe
n the same pattern moves coherently and unidirectionally. A stationary
version of the stimulus acted as a control. Our choice of paradigm wa
s inspired by psychophysical models and physiological studies in the m
acaque monkey which show that directionally selective cells in V5 resp
ond optimally to unidirectional coherent motion, whereas those of V1 r
espond to motion within their receptive fields, regardless of the moti
on in surrounding parts. Our results show that human V1/V2, V3, and V5
are all activated by both types of motion stimuli. Incoherent motion,
however, proved to be more effective than coherent motion in activati
ng V1/V2 and V5. Thus the higher perceptual salience of unidirectional
coherent motion in comparison to incoherent motion is not reflected b
y any increased activation of human area V5. (C) 1997 Academic Press.