THE RELEVANCE OF SENSORY INPUT FOR THE CEREBELLAR CONTROL OF MOVEMENTS

Citation
M. Jueptner et al., THE RELEVANCE OF SENSORY INPUT FOR THE CEREBELLAR CONTROL OF MOVEMENTS, NeuroImage, 5(1), 1997, pp. 41-48
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
10538119
Volume
5
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
41 - 48
Database
ISI
SICI code
1053-8119(1997)5:1<41:TROSIF>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The performance of a motor task not only requires subjects to plan, pr epare, and initiate but also to monitor how a movement is performed. W e used positron emission tomography to examine to what extent the huma n cerebellum is involved in controlling motor output or sensory input from movements in normal subjects. In the first study, we compared the active performance of a motor task (flexion and extension of the righ t elbow) to the passive execution of the same movements. Passive movem ents were driven by a motor with the arm fixed in a guide hinge. Activ e movements (compared to rest) elicited increases of rCBF mainly in th e ipsilateral neocerebellar hemisphere and vermis of the posterior lob e. During passive movements, almost identical parts of the cerebellar hemispheres and vermis were activated (compared to the rest condition) . The direct comparison of active and passive movement conditions reve aled a small activation of the neocerebellar hemisphere of the posteri or lobe and cerebellar nuclei ipsilateral to the movement. Approximate ly 90% of cerebellar neuronal activity was related to sensory input. I n the second study, we compared the execution of a free selection joys tick movement task to a condition in which subjects simply imagined th e movements. The execution of movements (compared to rest) was associa ted with increases of rCBF in the ipsilateral neocerebellar hemisphere and vermis of the posterior lobe. During movement imagination, a smal l part of the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere and vermis of the post erior lobe was activated (compared to rest). The increase of rCBF duri ng movement imagination accounted for only 20% of the signal seen duri ng movement execution. Our results indicate that the neocerebellum may be much more concerned with sensory information processing than has b een considered previously. (C) 1997 Academic Press.