EFFECTS OF BASE CATION FERTILIZATION ON SOIL AND FOLIAGE NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS, AND LITTER-FALL AND THROUGHFALL NUTRIENT FLUXES IN A SUGAR MAPLE FOREST
Jw. Fyles et al., EFFECTS OF BASE CATION FERTILIZATION ON SOIL AND FOLIAGE NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS, AND LITTER-FALL AND THROUGHFALL NUTRIENT FLUXES IN A SUGAR MAPLE FOREST, Canadian journal of forest research, 24(3), 1994, pp. 542-549
Application of base cation fertilizers is widely used to ameliorate de
cline symptoms in hardwood forests in southern Quebec, but little is k
nown about the effects of fertilization on nutrient cycling. Control a
nd fertilized plots in a sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) dominated
stand were monitored over a 4-year period to determine the effects of
fertilization on exchangeable soil base cations in soil, foliar nutri
ent concentrations, and fluxes of N, K, Ca, and Mg in litter fall and
throughfall. Fertilization had a large, immediate effect on exchangeab
le K, whereas effects on Ca and Mg were delayed and restricted to the
organic forest floor, presumably because of the lower solubility of th
e limestone-based Ca and Mg components of the fertilizer. Fertilizatio
n raised pH in the organic forest floor the second and third years aft
er application but had no effect in the B horizon. Foliar K, Ca, and M
g were elevated in the year of fertilization, but foliar concentration
s of Ca and Mg did not differ from, or were lower than, controls in fo
llowing years. Litter-fall K flux was increased by fertilization, but
litter-fall Ca and Mg fluxes and all throughfall base cation fluxes we
re unaffected. In control plots, nutrient concentrations in soil remai
ned relatively constant throughout the study, but foliar concentration
s and, in particular, litter-fall fluxes varied widely from year to ye
ar. This natural variation caused control plots to shift from a state
of deficiency in N, Ca, and Mg to a nutrient-sufficient state between
the first and second years of study. Fertilization effects are superim
posed on a naturally variable nutrient cycling system, and controls on
this variability must be understood if fertilizer response is to be a
ccurately predicted.