Ww. Meyer et al., COMPARISON OF CALCUTRIPT LITHOCLAS - ELEC TROHYDRAULIC LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS ACOUSTIC PRESSURE WAVE LITHOTRIPSY - IN-VITRO STUDY ON CHALK CUBES, Annales d'Urologie, 28(2), 1994, pp. 73-78
Intracorporeal lithotripters are available in nearly all urological in
stitutions. The authors compared the CALCUTRIPT made by K. Storz Co. a
nd the Swiss LITHOCLAST in in vitro studies. No major difference in th
e efficacy of disintegration was observed after subjecting chalk cubes
to the two modalities. Human tissue of the renal pelvis, ureter and b
ladder was exposed to both energy-sources. In the case of the electroh
ydraulic shock wave the authors found complete rupture of all three la
yers of the ureteric wall after exposure even with low energy, while t
issue perforation was observed in only one of 72 tissue samples expose
d to the LITHOCLAST. The authors recommend the LITHOCLAST because of i
ts minimal invasiveness for the treatment of calculi especially in the
ureter.