HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS E6 AND E7 ONCOPROTEINS ALTER CELL-CYCLE PROGRESSION BUT NOT RADIOSENSITIVITY OF CARCINOMA-CELLS TREATED WITH LOW-DOSE-RATE RADIATION
Tl. Deweese et al., HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS E6 AND E7 ONCOPROTEINS ALTER CELL-CYCLE PROGRESSION BUT NOT RADIOSENSITIVITY OF CARCINOMA-CELLS TREATED WITH LOW-DOSE-RATE RADIATION, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 37(1), 1997, pp. 145-154
Citations number
85
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Low-dose-rate radiation therapy has been widely used in the t
reatment of urogenital malignancies, When continuously exposed to low-
dose-rate ionizing radiation, target cancer cells typically exhibit ab
normalities in replicative cell-cycle progression, Cancer cells that a
rrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle when irradiated may become exq
uisitely sensitive to killing by further low-dose-rate radiation treat
ment, Oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPVs), which play a major role
in the pathogenesis of uterine cervix cancers and other urogenital ca
ncers, encode E6 and E7 transforming proteins known to abrogate a p53-
dependent G1 cell-cycle checkpoint activated by conventional acute-dos
e radiation exposure, This study examined whether expression of BPV E6
and E7 oncoproteins by cancer cells alters the cell-cycle redistribut
ion patterns accompanying low-dose-rate radiation treatment, and wheth
er such alterations in cell-cycle redistribution affect cancer cell ki
lling. Methods and Materials: RKO carcinoma cells, which contain wild-
type P53 alleles, and RKO cell sublines genetically engineered to expr
ess HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins, were treated with low-dose-rate (0.25-
Gy/h) radiation and then assessed for p53 and p21WAF1/CIP1 polypeptide
induction by immunoblot analysis, for cell-cycle redistribution by fl
ow cytometry, and for cytotoxicity by clonogenic survival assay. Resul
ts: Low-dose-rate radiation of RKO carcinoma cells triggered p53 polyp
eptide elevations, p21WAF1/CIP1 induction, and arrest in the G1 and G2
phases of the cell cycle, In contrast, RKO cells expressing E6 and E7
transforming proteins from high-risk oncogenic HPVs (HPV 16) arrested
in G2, but failed to arrest in G1, when treated with low-dose-rate io
nizing radiation, Abrogation of the G1 cell-cycle checkpoint activated
by low-dose-rate radiation exposure appeared to be a characteristic f
eature of transforming proteins from high-risk oncogenic HPVs: RKO cel
ls expressing E6 from a low-risk nononcogenic HPV (HPV 11) exposed to
low-dose-rate radiation arrested in both G1 and G2, Surprisingly, desp
ite differences in cell-cycle redistribution accompanying low-dose-rat
e radiation treatment associated with high-risk HPV transforming prote
in expression, no consistent differences in clonogenic survival follow
ing low-dose-rate radiation treatment were found for RKO cell sublines
expressing high-risk HPV oncoproteins and arresting only in G2 during
low-dose-rate radiation exposure vs, RKO cell sublines exhibiting bot
h G1 and G2 cell-cycle arrest when irradiated. Conclusion: The results
of this study demonstrate that neither HPV oncoprotein expression nor
loss of the radiation-activated G1 cell-cycle checkpoint alter the se
nsitivity of RKO carcinoma cell lines to low-dose-rate radiation expos
ure in vitro, Perhaps for urogenital malignanices associated with onco
genic HPVs in vivo, HPV oncoprotein-mediated abrogation of the G1 cell
-cycle checkpoint may not limit the potential efficacy of low-dose-rat
e radiation therapy. Copyright (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.