The author applies to South Asia a theory of armament that he develope
d in the context of the superpowers' arms rivalry. The empirical findi
ngs are consistent with the results for the superpowers' case: India a
nd Pakistan are found to have matched high levels of armaments with lo
w levels and vice versa. Such results are analytically similar to empi
rical evidence on alliances showing that states, including India and P
akistan, often ally with the stronger against the weaker side. In both
cases the evidence contradicts conventional wisdom on power balancing
, internal and external, respectively. The author's theory explains th
is otherwise anomalous phenomenon: states use strength not just as an
indicator of capability but also of intentions: given the same amount
of hostile behavior, weak states appear more aggressive than strong on
es. Hence, if states worry about intentions more than about power, the
y would be attracted to stronger states precisely because of their str
ength, not despite it.