T. Goeser et al., PREVALENCE AND SEROLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF HEPATITIS-C VIRUS-INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATITIS NON-A, NON-B - A FOLLOW-UP-STUDY, La Presse medicale, 23(17), 1994, pp. 793-796
Objectives: Sera of patients with acute hepatitis non-A, non-B prospec
tively followed for a mean of 11.4 years (range 9 to 15 years) were as
sayed for anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) by first- and second-generation
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and second-generation recom
binant immunoblot assay (RIBA) to study the patterns of antibody respo
nse in relation to the outcome of disease. Methods: From 1974 through
1981, 112 patients with acute hepatitis non-A, non-B were enrolled in
a prospective study. Sera of 45 patients taken during the acute phase
of hepatitis, as well as taken during follow-up in 1983 and 1990 were
still available for evaluation. Sera were assayed by first- (ELISA-1)
and second-generation (ELISA-2) anti-HCV ELISA, second-generation RIBA
(RIBA-2) and HCV RNA by RT-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results:
Based on anti-HCV seropositivity by RIBA-2 in acute hepatitis and/or d
uring follow-up, a total of 22/45 patients with HNANB (48.8%) were con
sidered to have confirmed HCV infection. By ELISA-1, 11/22-patients wi
th HCV infection (50%) were positive for anti-HCV within 6 weeks of th
e onset of illness, 18/22 sera (82%) were reactive by ELISA-2. Confirm
ation by RIBA-2 was obtained in 12 (55%) cases, while one additional p
atient was RIBA-2 indeterminate. In 1983, a disappearance of anti-HCV
tested by RIBA-2 was observed in 7/12 resolved patients but in none of
the patients with chronic hepatitis (p = 0.0018) while loss of anti-H
CV was observed in 2/12 cases with resolved hepatitis and none with ch
ronic hepatitis by ELISA (not significant). In 1990, all patients with
chronic hepatitis were still positive by either ELISA or RIBA-2 but 9
/12 (75%), 6/12 (50%) and 10/11 (91%) patients with resolved hepatitis
had lost anti-HCV serepositivity tested by ELISA-1 (p = 0.0004), ELIS
A-2 (p = 0.0124) or RIBA-2 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Mostly, RIBA-2
reactivity was lost prior to ELISA-2 reactivity during follow-up. Rate
s of antibody loss as detected by ELISA-1, EL1SA-2 and RIBA-2 were 4.1
, 2.9 and 5.8 per 100 person years, respectively.Conclusions: This stu
dy shows that the continuing presence of HCV is necessary to maintain
anti-HCV seropositivity. In contrast, anti-HCV reactivity is progressi
vely lost over time in resolved patients. In addition, albeit more spe
cific, the RIBA-2 is less sensitive than the ELISA and RIBA seroconver
sion to negative seems to be the earliest serological marker of a reso
lved HCV infection.