Few organizations have the courage to evaluate their own use of risk a
ssessment (identifying hazards and estimating their probability and ma
gnitude) and risk communication (interacting with internal and externa
l stakeholder groups about risks). The USDA Animal and Plant Health In
spection Service (APHIS) wants to enhance its overall risk analysis pr
ocess for managing a wide range of risks to animals, plants, and human
health. We gathered survey data for a baseline of APHIS professionals
' understanding and use of risk assessment and risk communication. APH
IS professionals spend a surprisingly large share of their time commun
icating about risks. They perceive that risk estimates influence decis
ions, but that risk estimates should have more influence. Respondents
reported little opposition to APHIS risk management decisions, and lit
tle use of channels such as USDA Extension Service for disseminating r
isk messages. Substantial variance across responses is explained mostl
y by differences in the roles of the 11 work units (now 10) within the
agency. Location also contributes to the variance. Demographic variab
les seem less important.