Of. Pedersen et al., PORTABLE PEAK FLOW METERS - PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS, INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE, ALTITUDE, AND HUMIDITY, The European respiratory journal, 7(5), 1994, pp. 991-997
Little is known about the linearity of portable peak flow meters, or a
bout physical gas factors affecting peak expiratory flow (PEF) reading
s. We therefore tested five portable peak flow meters of three types i
n an altitude chamber (sea level to 5,500 m) and in a climate chamber
at sea level (7-37 degrees C) to determine the influence of the physic
al conditions of the gas on the reading of the meters. The nonlinear r
esponse of the variable orifice meters was confirmed and, when this wa
s corrected for, the readings of these meters were found to be signifi
cantly reduced by higher altitude and lower temperature. The readings
from a turbine type of peak now meter were not affected by altitude bu
t were reduced at low temperature. A mathematical model for the variab
le orifice meters could correct for both their nonlinear behaviour and
the effect of gas density (altitude, temperature and humidity). The m
odel showed that correction is not necessary for the differences in ga
s conditions between calibration and taking of measurements under norm
al laboratory conditions. All the meters tested had impedances higher
than recommended (0.05 kPa.l(-1).s) and this may influence PEF at high
flows. The mean uncorrected PEF of six healthy subjects when measured
with a Mini Wright peak flow meter at sea level and at 3,000 m fell b
y 5%, but the mean corrected PEF increased by 12%. This increase in PE
F was about 60% of that predicted for fully density-dependent flow and
agreed with the findings of other similar studies. We conclude that o
rifice meters give satisfactory PEF readings at different altitudes an
d temperatures, provided adequate correction is made for their nonline
arity and the influence of gas density.