Licensed psychologists from 1 midwestern state were surveved to assess
the nature of clinical supervision for experienced practitioners. Dat
a were collected concerning type, frequency, and content of supervisio
n; supervisor goals, techniques, assessment methods, and roles; and mo
st and least helpful aspects of supervision. There were few significan
t differences in supervision as a function of supervisee experience, g
ender, or degree (MA vs. PhD), or supervisor gender. The supervisees g
enerally appeared to have autonomous relationships with supervisors wh
o were clinically skilled and highly supportive. Several ethical conce
rns regarding supervisee informed consent, supervisor accountability,
and gender-role stereotyping are discussed, and recommendations for ad
ditional research are made.