Policies restricting the employment opportunities of women have a long
history in the U.S. The most recent manifestation has been so-called
''fetal protection'' policies, which exclude women of childbearing age
from jobs involving exposure to toxins considered dangerous to a deve
loping fetus. Traditional arguments that women's biology is justificat
ion to keep them from jobs have resurfaced in a new form. In the prese
nt debate the issue is framed as one of competing rights, those of the
fetus versus those of the woman. An analysis of public policy on this
issue from a feminist legal standpoint reveals how the law's implicit
male standard hinders the attainment of equal employment opportunity
for women, as they must now compete with hypothetical fetuses as well
as with men.