The data with which Student illustrated the application of his famous
distribution are examined from a number of aspects. Central to the dis
cussion is the within-patient clinical trial at Kalamazoo whose result
s were published by Cushny and Peebles and misquoted by Student and Fi
sher. This trial is discussed from historical, pharmacological and sta
tistical perspectives. Student's and Fisher's analyses and a more mode
rn analysis by Preece are considered as is Cushny's and Peebles's inte
rpretation. Brief biographies of the five physicians involved in runni
ng the trial are presented.