Re. Peter et al., BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF INTERNAL-FIXATION OF THE DISTAL TIBIOFIBULARSYNDESMOTIC JOINT - COMPARISON OF 2 FIXATION TECHNIQUES, Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 8(3), 1994, pp. 215-219
This biomechanical study compares two methods of internal fixation of
the tibiofibular syndesmosis used in Weber type C malleolar fractures
of the ankle. The transverse syndesmotic 3.5-mm screw was compared wit
h two 1.5-mm Kirschner wires introduced obliquely across the distal ti
biofibular syndesmosis. The influence of implants on distal tibiofibul
ar joint motion and contact characteristics of the intact ankle joint
were determined. Up to 1.25 mm of lateral displacement and 2-degrees o
f external rotation of the lateral malleolus during uninjured ankle do
rsiflexion was recorded. Both techniques stabilized the injured syndes
motic joint and limited its normal motion during flexion and extension
of the ankle. Pressure distribution displaced laterally in internally
stabilized ankles compared with intact specimens, regardless of the t
ype of fixation used. Therefore, both techniques alter joint biomechan
ics equivalently compared with the intact ankle.