P. Krugliak et al., MECHANISMS AND SITES OF MANNITOL PERMEABILITY OF SMALL AND LARGE-INTESTINE IN THE RAT, Digestive diseases and sciences, 39(4), 1994, pp. 796-801
Mannitol is commonly used as an intestinal permeability probe, yet the
mechanisms of its penetration of the intestinal barrier are nor entir
ety clear. Therefore, we studied mannitol's permeability of different
segments of the intestine and studied the kinetics and influence of in
traluminal factors on mannitol permeability in vivo in perfused intest
inal segments of rats. There was linear relationship between permeabil
ity rate of mannitol and its luminal concentration (y = 7.2x + 1.7; r
= 0.98), indicating that passive diffusion is involved in mannitol's p
ermeability. Increased luminal fluid osmolarity front 0.3 to 0.6 osmol
/liter resulted in decreased net waterflux with a corresponding decrea
se in mannitol permeability in both jejunum and colon (P < 0.01), indi
cating the prominent influence of solvent drag on net mannitol permeab
ility. The relationship between mannitol permeability and water absorp
tion at different osmolarities was linear in the jejunum and colon. At
luminal osmolarity of 0.3 osmol/liter, 34.6% of mannitol permeability
was mediated by passive diffusion and 65.4% was mediated by solvent d
rag in the jejunum. Mannitol permeability was much more dependent on s
olvent drag in the colon (88.9%) than in the small intestine (65.4%).
The net permeability rate of mannitol was similar in the jejunum and i
leum but was much higher in the colon (P < 0.01). Addition of chenodeo
xycholate (5 mM) to the perfusate resulted in a significant decrease i
n absorption of water (p < 0.01) with a corresponding decrease in mann
itol permeability (P < 0.01). These studies indicate that mannitol per
meability of the intestinal barrier is mediated by passive diffusion a
nd solvent drag, with the latter accounting for a greater fraction of
the total permeability.