J. Bijma et C. Hemleben, POPULATION-DYNAMICS OF THE PLANKTIC FORAMINIFER GLOBIGERINOIDES-SACCULIFER (BRADY) FROM THE CENTRAL RED-SEA, Deep-sea research. Part 1. Oceanographic research papers, 41(3), 1994, pp. 485-510
In the central Red Sea the planktic foraminifer Globigerinoides saccul
ifer (Brady) lives in the upper 80 m of the water column and depth pre
ferences for different size classes could clearly be established. Repr
oduction takes place at full moon, at about 80 m water depth, probably
within the chlorophyll maximum. Juveniles ascend in the water column
and reach the surface after less than approximately 2 weeks, before th
ey are 100 mum in diameter. Pre-adult stages of ca. 200 mum steadily d
escend within 9-10 days to the reproductive depth. We identify four mo
rphotypes within G. sacculifer. On the basis of shape of the last cham
ber, two basic morphotypes are defined; normalform and sac-like. The r
elative size of the last chamber determines two further, secondary, mo
rphotypes; kummerform and kummersac, respectively. In terms of earlier
classifications, the kummersac morphotype forms an intergrade between
kummerform and sac-like. Analysis of size, depth distribution and tim
e of morphotype formation do not demonstrate a distinct relation betwe
en the kummersac and one of the primary morphotypes. Kummerform and ku
mmersac formation reach a peak shortly before full moon, whereas the h
ighest frequencies of sac-like chambers are found around new moon. Sin
ce formation of these morphotypes leads gametogenesis by 24-48 h, it c
ould indicate that the reproduction of sac-like morphotypes is isolate
d from the rest. Although additional evidence is required to decide on
the taxonomic status of the normalform and the sac-like morphotype, i
t is tempting to speculate that reproductive isolation over time can p
lay an important role in the process of speciation. The mean and media
n sizes of the living population and of the flux assemblage differ mai
nly because of the growth component in the standing stock and differen
tial sedimentation speed of dead and gametogenic specimens. Difference
s between the flux assemblage and the thanatocoenosis cannot be explai
ned by simple dissolution phenomena.