VOLUNTARY TESTING FOR HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS (HIV) IN A PRISON POPULATION WITH A HIGH PREVALENCE OF HIV

Citation
C. Behrendt et al., VOLUNTARY TESTING FOR HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS (HIV) IN A PRISON POPULATION WITH A HIGH PREVALENCE OF HIV, American journal of epidemiology, 139(9), 1994, pp. 918-926
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
00029262
Volume
139
Issue
9
Year of publication
1994
Pages
918 - 926
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9262(1994)139:9<918:VTFH(I>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
This study evaluated voluntary testing for human immunodeficiency viru s (HIV) in a prison population with a high HIV seroprevalence. Data on demographic variables and participation in voluntary testing were lin ked to a blinded HIV serosurvey of consecutive Maryland prison entrant s (April-July 1991). Among 2,842 entrants, HIV seroprevalence was 8.5% (men, 7.9%; women, 15.3%). Voluntary testing was accepted by 47% of t he entrants, and it identified 34% of the HIV-seropositive inmates det ected by serosurvey. Refusers of testing were more likely to test HIV- seropositive than were accepters (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58-2.16). Refusers and accepters of testin g had similar risk factors for HIV infection, chiefly current syphilis infection (adjusted OR = 5.96, 95% CI 3.15-10.27) and prior injected drug use (adjusted OR = 4.26, 95% CI 3.15-5.76). Among 100 entrants as ked why they refused testing, primary reasons given included low risk of HIV, fear of testing HIV-seropositive, and lack of interest. Volunt ary testing appears only moderately successful in identifying HIV-sero positive inmates in a high-seroprevalence prison population. However, the alternative, mandatory HIV testing of prisoners, can be construed as discriminatory and unethical when similar screening is not imposed on the population at large. Data presented here suggest strategies to improve acceptance of voluntary testing, especially by high risk inmat es.