Ad. Reynolds, SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY FROM CORE AND WIRELINE LOG DATA - THE VIKING FORMATION, ALBIAN, SOUTH CENTRAL ALBERTA, CANADA, Marine and petroleum geology, 11(3), 1994, pp. 258-282
An extensive core and wireline log database has allowed a regional (20
0000 km2) high resolution sequence stratigraphic analysis of the predo
minantly shallow marine, Viking Formation of south-western Alberta, Ca
nada. The study has revealed new insights into: (i) the geometry and o
rigin of sequence boundaries; (ii) temporal changes in shelf processes
across key sequence stratigraphic surfaces; and (iii) the origin of t
he Viking Formation. Five regionally significant erosion surfaces (VE1
-4 and VE3c) define six units, A-F, within the Viking Formation. Each
unit is characterized by one or more of four facies associations: (i)
tide-dominated shelf; (ii) storm-dominated shoreline-shelf; (iii) coas
tal plain; and (iv) estuarine. Sequence stratigraphic analysis of thes
e units and their bounding surfaces defines five sequence boundaries a
nd four sequences that correspond to units A, B and C, and D and E com
bined. Units A-C are lowstand deposits that are underlain by sequence
boundaries and record stepped sea-level fall in a tidal shelf setting.
Unit A is underlain by a correlative conformity, whereas units B and
C are underlain by regionally extensive erosion surfaces that have a r
olling topography and are considered to have been formed subaqueously
by tidal scour. Unit D is an estuarine valley fill unit that records f
urther sea-level fall. It is underlain by a laterally restricted erosi
on surface (VE3c) and capped by a regionally extensive transgressive s
urface (VE3). Unit E is a storm-dominated shoreline-shelf succession t
hat forms a highstand systems tract to the VE3c sequence boundary. In
turn unit E is capped by a stepped transgressive surface, coincident w
ith a further sequence boundary. The potential for tidal currents to g
enerate regional subaqueous erosion surfaces is great but not widely r
ecognized. In tide-dominated environments, such surfaces are likely du
ring relative sea-level fall and may be a common correlative surface t
o subaerial sequence boundaries. Similarly, changes in dominant shelf
processes across key sequence stratigraphic surfaces may be more commo
n than previously realized. Finally, the recognition of regionally ext
ensive tidal deposits in units A-C is in marked contrast with several
recent studies where the same successions have been interpreted as low
stand shoreline deposits.