A. Tanizawa et al., COMPARISON OF TOPOISOMERASE-I INHIBITION, DNA-DAMAGE, AND CYTOTOXICITY OF CAMPTOTHECIN DERIVATIVES PRESENTLY IN CLINICAL-TRIALS, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 86(11), 1994, pp. 836-842
Background: Camptothecins belong to a group of anticancer agents with
a unique mechanism of action: poisoning of eukaryotic DNA topoisomeras
e I. Two camptothecin derivatives, topotecan (TPT) and CPT-11, are in
clinical trials and their chemotherapeutic efficacy appears promising.
Purpose: Our aim was to compare simultaneously the molecular and cell
ular pharmacology of the various camptothecin derivatives that are pre
sently in clinical trials. Methods: Cytotoxicity of drugs toward human
colon carcinoma HT-29 cells was determined by colony-forming assays.
DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) were measured by alkaline elution. Drug
potency to induce topoisomerase I-mediated DNA cleavage and the seque
nce selectivity of the breaks were determined by sequencing gel autora
diography. Results: SN-38 and CPT were more cytotoxic than 9-AC and TP
T, and CPT-11 was almost inactive toward HT-29 cells. IC50 values were
8.8 nM for SN-38, 10 nM for CPT, 19 nM for 9-AC, 33 nM for TPT, and g
reater than 100 nM for CPT-11. In drug-induced DNA damage measured by
alkaline elution drug concentrations producing 1000-rad-equivalents (C
-1000), values were 0.037 mu M for SN-38, 0.051 mu M for CPT, 0.085 mu
M for 9-AC, 0.28 mu M for TPT, and greater than 1 mu M for CPT-11. SN
-38 remained the most potent compound in isolated nuclei, and CPT-11 w
as still inactive. The potency ranking was the same as in whole cells,
and the C-1000 values were 0.0025 mu M for SN-38, 0.012 mu M for CPT,
0.021 mu M for 9-AC, 0.44 mu M for TPT, and greater than 0.1 mu M for
CPT-11. Potency difference between SN-38 and the other compounds was
greater in isolated nuclei than in whole cells. Conclusions: Kinetics
of the reversal of drug-induced SSB in isolated nuclei suggest that di
ssociation of SN-38 from cleavable complexes is much slower than that
of CPT. Cleavage patterns of CPT and 9-AC were similar but differed fr
om those of TPT and SN-38. Although in vitro analyses do not necessari
ly reflect chemotherapeutic efficacy, this study found that SN-38 is t
he most potent compound and that 9-AC and TPT are less active than CPT
in this system. The effect of CPT-11 is minimal. Therefore, the clini
cal activity of CPT-11 may strongly depend on its hydrolysis to SN-38.
Differences in DNA sequence selectivity and the stability of cleavabl
e complexes induced by the drugs may also contribute to differences am
ong CPT derivatives.-