CYTOLOGICAL SCREENING AND MANAGEMENT OF ABNORMALITIES IN PREVENTION OF CERVICAL-CANCER - AN OVERVIEW WITH STOCHASTIC MODELING

Citation
C. Sherlawjohnson et al., CYTOLOGICAL SCREENING AND MANAGEMENT OF ABNORMALITIES IN PREVENTION OF CERVICAL-CANCER - AN OVERVIEW WITH STOCHASTIC MODELING, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 47(5), 1994, pp. 430-435
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology
ISSN journal
00219746
Volume
47
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
430 - 435
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9746(1994)47:5<430:CSAMOA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Aims-To develop a mathematical model of the histological changes of pr ecancer and the development of invasive cancer and how these are relat ed to cytological findings. To use this to investigate the effects on incidence of cervical cancer, number of smear tests and colposcopies, of different schedules for cervical screening, and the clinical manage ment policies for dyskaryosis. Methods-A stochastic model was develope d relating the available data on tissue progression to the cytological findings. Two strategies, A and B, were compared: under A, women with any abnormal smear receive immediate colposcopy and treatment; under B, women with mild or borderline dyskaryosis have repeated smears at s ix monthly intervals with colposcopy only for persistent abnormalities .Results-The model predicted an incidence of invasive cervical cancer in an unscreened population of women aged over 18 years of 5.9 per 10 000 per year. With 70% coverage and three yearly screening under strat egy A, the incidence fell to 2.00 and under B to 2.10. The number of s mears required was similar but A required two to three times as many c olposcopies as B. Raising the coverage to 90% reduced the incidence to around 1 per 10 000 per year but changing the screening interval, the specificity or sensitivity of cytology had much less effect. Conclusi on-The model has been tested under a wide range of possible variations in natural history, specificity and sensitivity of cytology. For low grade smear abnormalities, open colposcopic referral is predicted to r educe invasive cancer only slightly more than repeat cytology, at the expense of much additional colposcopy. Improving cytological coverage is suggested as more effective in reducing invasive cancer than increa sed use of colposcopy or more frequent screening.