SCANDINAVIAN MULTICENTER POROUS-COATED ANATOMIC TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY STUDY - CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC RESULTS WITH 7 TO 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION

Citation
H. Malchau et al., SCANDINAVIAN MULTICENTER POROUS-COATED ANATOMIC TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY STUDY - CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC RESULTS WITH 7 TO 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION, The Journal of arthroplasty, 12(2), 1997, pp. 133-148
Citations number
58
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Biomedical
Journal title
ISSN journal
08835403
Volume
12
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
133 - 148
Database
ISI
SICI code
0883-5403(1997)12:2<133:SMPATH>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Four hundred ninety-four patients (539 hips) with a mean age of 50.1 ( SD, 9.7) years entered a prospective, multicenter study of the Porous Coated Anatomic (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) total hip arthroplasty. Th e preoperative diagnoses were primary osteoarthrosis (297 hips), secon dary osteoarthrosis to childhood diseases (88 hips), fracture (73 hips ), inflammatory arthritis (26 hips), idiopathic avascular necrosis (28 ), and miscellaneous (27 hips). After a mean follow-up period of 6 yea rs and 10 months, 71 hips had been revised. The mean Harris hip score increased from 43 (15.7) to 94 (7.4) at the last follow-up evaluation, without any deterioration with time. After 7 years, the combined surv ival rate for the cup and/or stem using revision as endpoint was 92.2% . Radiographic failure, defined as migration of either component more than 5 mm and/or focal osteolysis, was registered in 72 stems and 96 c ups. The combined clinical (revision) and radiographic 7-year survival rates were 61.1 (+/- 5.2) and 59.7 (+/- 5.3) for the stem and cup, re spectively. Statistical analysis revealed that young age and poor fill rate influenced the rate of stem failure, whereas cup failure was dif ficult to predict. Four variables were associated with stem subsidence : loosening of beads, pedestal formation, sclerotic lines in Gruen zon e 7, and acetabular granuloma. According to our findings, the 5- to 10 -year complication rate with this implant is high. Therefore, continuo us radiographic follow-up evaluation of these cases is strongly recomm ended, to enable revision before severe destruction of bone or catastr ophic clinical failure has occurred.