Aims: To assess the current level of information and use of quality of
life assessment instruments by Italian physicians involved in oncolog
ic patient care. Methods: Specifically trained scientific representati
ves of a pharmaceutical company interviewed 2237 hospital physicians a
ll over Italy. Results: A total of 1390 physicians (62.1%) had some kn
owledge of quality of life assessment tools in oncology, but 364 of th
em (26.2%) were unable to recall the name of any instruments. The one
that was most frequently recalled by the 1026 physicians who knew of t
he existence of one or more instruments was the Karnofsky Performance
Status (KPS) (91%) followed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
performance scale (ECOG) (35.5%) whereas the Quality of Life Index and
Visual Analogue Scale were at the very bottom of the list (5.9% and 3
.7%, respectively). Physician age and type of department were found to
be strong predictors of knowledge of the instruments, which was great
er among young physicians and those working in oncological departments
. Of the physicians aware of the KPS, 56.6% used it, whereas the perce
ntage of physicians using ECOG was higher (69.5%). Conclusions: The co
llected data indicate a poor knowledge of quality of life assessment i
nstruments in Italian physicians. Most physicians tend to use so-calle
d <<objective>> instruments where the assessment is made by the physic
ian and not by the patient (KPS, ECOG Quality of Life index), are prac
tically unaware of the new generation of <<subjective>> self-rating in
struments. The use of such instruments in particular might provide gre
ater insights into the impact of the disease and related treatments on
the quality of life of cancer patients.