Hj. Odendaal et al., DOES A NONREACTIVE FETAL HEART-RATE PATTERN REALLY MEAN FETAL DISTRESS, American journal of perinatology, 11(3), 1994, pp. 194-198
The aim of the study was to compare three different fetal heart rate (
FHR) patterns, namely, a nonreactive pattern with good long-term varia
bility (fluctuation of 5 or more beats/min), a reactive pattern, and a
nonreactive pattern with poor long-term variability (less than 5 beat
s/min). For this purpose, nonstress tests done less than 24 hours befo
re delivery and FHR patterns recorded during labor were separately ass
essed. Endpoints for comparison were 5-minute Apgar scores, intrauteri
ne growth retardation, and umbilical blood gas values at birth. Regard
ing the nonstress test, the prevalence of low 5-minute Apgar scores in
reactive, good variability, and in poor variability patterns were 7.2
%, 5.3%, and 24%, respectively. The prevalences of small for gestation
al age newborns were 8%, 17.6%, and 60.6%, respectively. Blood gas val
ues did not differ significantly. Regarding the FHR patterns during la
bor, using the same sequence, the prevalences of low 5-minute Apgar sc
ores were 3.5%, 6%, and 23%, respectively. Small for gestational age b
abies occurred in 8.8%, 15.6%, and 80% of the different FHR patterns,
respectively. Regarding umbilical artery blood gas values, the only si
gnificant difference was a lower pH in the poor variability group. No
difference was found between the blood gas values of babies with a rea
ctive pattern and a nonreactive pattern with good variability.