Development of Appalachian coal mining has been severely hampered by l
ack of domestic waste disposal technologies suited to fills. This rese
arch was conducted to evaluate the potential for biological renovation
of domestic wastewater in fill produced from mining operations. Soil-
fill (a mixture of Jefferson, fine-loamy, siliceous, mesic Typic Haplu
dult and Muskingom, fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrept soils)
and spoil-fill (blasted rock material associated with the Taggart Mar
ker and Low Splint Bench coal seams) were used in this study. Septic t
ank effluent (STE) and sand filter effluent. (SFE) were applied to soi
l-fill columns at four loading rates (0, 5.4, 10.8, and 21/6 L m-2 d-1
) and spoil-fill columns at one loading rate (21.6 L m-2 d-1) for a pe
riod of 20 wk. Fecal coliform numbers were reduced by 89 to 99% after
passing SFE and STE through the fill columns. Coliform counts in efflu
ent from the soil- and spoil-fill columns were lower where SFE was app
lied as compared with STE. There were no significant differences betwe
en coliform counts in effluent from soil-fill and spoil-fill columns,
although there was a trend toward higher counts in effluent from the s
poil-fill columns. When soil-fill columns were considered, coliforms w
ere reduced more effectively (at the highest loading rate) in columns
receiving SFE when compared with columns receiving STE. This study ind
icates that selected fills may be used when consideration is given to
wastewater treatment and loading rate.