USE OF MINE FILLS FOR BIOLOGICAL RENOVATION OF DOMESTIC WASTE-WATER

Citation
Ce. Peterson et al., USE OF MINE FILLS FOR BIOLOGICAL RENOVATION OF DOMESTIC WASTE-WATER, Journal of environmental quality, 23(3), 1994, pp. 592-596
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences
ISSN journal
00472425
Volume
23
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
592 - 596
Database
ISI
SICI code
0047-2425(1994)23:3<592:UOMFFB>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Development of Appalachian coal mining has been severely hampered by l ack of domestic waste disposal technologies suited to fills. This rese arch was conducted to evaluate the potential for biological renovation of domestic wastewater in fill produced from mining operations. Soil- fill (a mixture of Jefferson, fine-loamy, siliceous, mesic Typic Haplu dult and Muskingom, fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrept soils) and spoil-fill (blasted rock material associated with the Taggart Mar ker and Low Splint Bench coal seams) were used in this study. Septic t ank effluent (STE) and sand filter effluent. (SFE) were applied to soi l-fill columns at four loading rates (0, 5.4, 10.8, and 21/6 L m-2 d-1 ) and spoil-fill columns at one loading rate (21.6 L m-2 d-1) for a pe riod of 20 wk. Fecal coliform numbers were reduced by 89 to 99% after passing SFE and STE through the fill columns. Coliform counts in efflu ent from the soil- and spoil-fill columns were lower where SFE was app lied as compared with STE. There were no significant differences betwe en coliform counts in effluent from soil-fill and spoil-fill columns, although there was a trend toward higher counts in effluent from the s poil-fill columns. When soil-fill columns were considered, coliforms w ere reduced more effectively (at the highest loading rate) in columns receiving SFE when compared with columns receiving STE. This study ind icates that selected fills may be used when consideration is given to wastewater treatment and loading rate.