Ij. Deary et al., CONSTRUCTS AND MODELS IN HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY - THE CASE OF PERSONALITY AND ILLNESS REPORTING IN DIABETES-MELLITUS, British journal of health psychology, 2, 1997, pp. 35-54
Objectives. Construct overlap among important variables in health psyc
hology was studied. Competing theories related to the reporting of med
ically unexplained symptoms (somatization) and illness severity were e
xamined. These objectives were studied in the setting of insulin-depen
dent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Design. A correlational design was empl
oyed. Sufficient numbers of participants were sought in order to lest
theories of symptom reporting using structural equation modelling and
other multivariate techniques. Methods. Two hundred and two people wit
h IDDM attending a diabetes out-patient clinic acted as participants.
Personality traits, alexithymia and illness-related coping factors wer
e the key psychological constructs studied. Experience of medically un
explained symptoms (somatization) and diabetes severity were measured.
Results. Neuroticism, alexithymia and negative emotion coping were al
l significantly related to somatization, and there was significant con
struct overlap. Competing models of symptom reports-transactional vers
us negative affectivity-were formulated and tested using structural eq
uation modelling. However, the best fitting model was one that integra
ted features of both. Constructs showed considerable overlap, with evi
dence for a very general factor related to the reporting of negative a
ffects and bodily disturbances. However, there is also evidence of uni
que variance in constructs, especially that of negative emotion coping
. Conclusions. Important constructs used in health psychology show sig
nificant overlap, and this general source of variance warrants further
study. Despite overlap, constructs contributed unique variance to hea
lth outcomes. Transactional and negative affectivity models of symptom
reporting may be reconciled in an integrated model. Generalization of
the models tested here to other illness samples and healthy individua
ls is recommended. Suggestions are made for further research to refine
constructs in health psychology and to limit their present profusion.