Mj. Brossy et al., HEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE CHANGES AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH EITHER THIOPENTONE OR PROPOFOL WITH SUXAMETHONIUM, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 72(5), 1994, pp. 596-598
We have compared the haemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryn
goscopy and tracheal intubation in 43 patients after induction of anae
sthesia with either thiopentone 5.1 (SD 0.9) mg kg(-1) or propofol 2.2
(0.1) mg kg(-1), each with suxamethonium and without opioid pretreatme
nt. Heart rate increased significantly above baseline after induction
and intubation in both groups, but there were no differences between g
roups. Arterial pressure increased significantly at 1 min after intuba
tion in both groups and at 2 min in the thiopentone group only. Plasma
concentrations of adrenaline increased significantly compared with co
ncentrations before induction, 1 min after intubation in both groups a
nd at 2 min in the thiopentone group only. Plasma concentrations of ad
renaline were significantly greater in the thiopentone group than in t
he propofol group at both 1 and 2 min after intubation. Plasma concent
rations of noradrenaline showed no significant time-based within-group
changes, but were significantly greater in the thiopentone group at 1
and 2 min after intubation. We conclude that doses of either thiopent
one or propofol sufficient to obtund the eyelash reflex with suxametho
nium 1 mg kg(-1) alone do not adequately block the catecholamine and h
ypertensive responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in normal patient
s and although propofol suppressed increases in catecholamines to a gr
eater extent than thiopentone, there were no clinical advantages.